> Terry,
>
> It is very fine with this example, but I'm not even going to bother
> much with it for several reasons, most of which you can find codified
> in the development rules for X11 which you can find in Scheiflers
> book.
>
> But for the record: your example would get even shorter on
> the code we had before I started using the default op sensibly
> because all the layers tended to shunt things they didn't
> understand to errno rather than pass them through, so in
> fact my change took us closer to being able to handle the
> rather lofty example you have here.
>
> Once you show me an actual implementation which has a problem
> with it, I will look at it again, until then, I think pretty
> much everything else is more important (Scheiflers 1st rule :-)
>
> Poul-Henning
That's a fair requirement. I have some of Heidemann's code that
runs into the problem, but I don't have any that I can redistribute.
Would it be OK if I asked John to send you his code as well, if
you will abide with the non-redistribution requirement?
I understand the prioritization process, and FWIW, I agree with
it, in a resource-starved situation (e.g.g FreeBSD).
Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
