> > Have you tried Heidemann's student's stacking layers? There is one > > encryption, and one per-file compression with namespace hiding, that > > I think it would be hard pressed to keep up with. But I'll give it > > the benefit of the doubt. 8-). > > Nope. The problem is that while stacking (null, umap, and overlay fs's) > work, we don't have the coherency issues worked out so that upper layers > can cache data. i.e. so that the lower fs knows it has to ask the uper > layers to give pages back. :-) But multiple ls -lR's work fine. :-) Interesting, have you read the Heidemann paper that outlines a solution that uses a cache manager? You can probably find it somewhere here, http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/SOFTWARE/UCLA_STACKING/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Chuck Silvers
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund