On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 9:08 PM Adam Weinberger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Desktop team, > > I'm a huge fan of the statically-linked ImageMagick packages that some other > platforms supply, where there's essentially no runtime dependencies; even in > a minimal state, ImageMagick carries LOTS of dependencies. > > I'd like to make that an option for us. That said, it's pretty heavily > divergent from how the ImageMagick7 port is constructed today. > > Conceptually, would you rather see that as a patch for graphics/ImageMagick7 > that adds a static FLAVOR
This is preferred. Please get me on the hook when you get your patch to the review.
