On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM Gleb Popov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 9:08 PM Adam Weinberger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Desktop team, > > > > I'm a huge fan of the statically-linked ImageMagick packages that some > other platforms supply, where there's essentially no runtime dependencies; > even in a minimal state, ImageMagick carries LOTS of dependencies. > > > > I'd like to make that an option for us. That said, it's pretty heavily > divergent from how the ImageMagick7 port is constructed today. > > > > Conceptually, would you rather see that as a patch for > graphics/ImageMagick7 that adds a static FLAVOR > > This is preferred. Please get me on the hook when you get your patch > to the review. > Will do. Thanks, Gleb. -- Adam Weinberger [email protected]
