On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 14:14:48 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > While we may be stuck with this bait-and-switch "upgrade", I > think his complaints are not co easily addressed. Certainly, > the "exec" complaint remains valid, in any case: it's a bug > that csh didn't have. Complaints _are_ easily addressed, tcsh author is responsible and fix all thing that I report to him. If you complain about 'upgrade' problem, i.e. we don't have latest tcsh, ask our tcsh maintainer for upgrade. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... John Baldwin
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Warner Losh
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert