On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention. > > This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when > > we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up > > with any concrete differences that would cause harm, so the deed was > > done. > > It blew beets all over the startup script for ROM 2.4 MUD's. Error output?? Script?? We really cannot make things better w/o suffient information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Michael Lucas
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... Alexander Langer
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... John Baldwin
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... Jim Bryant