On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 03:01:33PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > "Our" csh still behaves differently like any /bin/csh on > > > any other system that I know, and can't be easily made to > > > behave like them. > > > > This is an assertion. Where is your supporting evidence? > > Hit "TAB"? Controllable behaviour. Next? Kris P.S. It's already been established (and quite blindingly obvious) that tcsh has different defaults than csh, that's not the issue here.
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... John Baldwin
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Warner Losh
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert