From: Jim Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:23:01 -0500 > Because of certain differences, it cannot be used wholesale as a > replacement for csh. Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention. This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up with any concrete differences that would cause harm, so the deed was done. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Michael Lucas
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jim Bryant
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... Alexander Langer
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... David O'Brien
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Oliver Fromme
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing..... John Baldwin
- Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Terry Lambert