On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:25PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: > Our current problem is that an older ld.so has somehow been made part > of compat22. I'm now attempting to determine whether the ld.so on > the 3.2 CD contains the fix in rev 1.57 of rtld-aout/rtld.c, and if > so I'll just commit it in the compat22 directory. Please delay committing -- since it is UUENCODED, it is a bit repo bloat if we don't get it right. It doesn't seem right to put 3.x bits into the compat22 dist. By definition they are the wrong bits. My internet connection is down for the past day, and I only have limited connectivity right now. But I would like to look into this before anything is committed. - -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for o... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Jeremy Lea
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Jeremy Lea
- Re: Is compatibility for o... John Hay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Donald J . Maddox