On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:00:28AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> So we could in principle build ld.so for every release.
I would say "no". The building of a.out bits is getting harder as more
and more framework pieces are removed. I don't quite fully understand
the problem yet. Do you have a binary that shows the problem other than
SimCity from a 3.x release CDROM? I don't have any 3.x CDROMs any more,
so I'd have to wait a while until I can find one at the office.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for o... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Jeremy Lea
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Jeremy Lea
