> <<On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT), "Rodney W. Grimes" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Ohh... and a finally note, DEC blew the chip design by only including > > a 160byte threshold point given that PCI 2.0 spec says it should have > > been 500bytes!! > > It wouldn't be the first thing DEC had screwed up in the design of > these NICs. On the other hand, Intel has owned the silicon for a > couple of years now, which is more than enough time to unscrew it if > they really wanted to. Clearly, they'd rather be selling 82559s.... As far as I can tell the fxp driver doesn't even use the tx_fifo in the 825xxx chips :-) -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4.0-S) Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4... Scott Flatman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4... Wilko Bulte
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Matthew Jacob
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangenes... Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Peter Jeremy
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangenes... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Garrett Wollman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... David Greenman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Mike Smith