<<On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT), "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ohh... and a finally note, DEC blew the chip design by only including > a 160byte threshold point given that PCI 2.0 spec says it should have > been 500bytes!! It wouldn't be the first thing DEC had screwed up in the design of these NICs. On the other hand, Intel has owned the silicon for a couple of years now, which is more than enough time to unscrew it if they really wanted to. Clearly, they'd rather be selling 82559s.... -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4.0-S) Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness with 4... Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Scott Flatman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Wilko Bulte
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangenes... Matthew Jacob
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangenes... Peter Jeremy
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangeness wi... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strangenes... Stephen McKay
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: Strang... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: S... Garrett Wollman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: S... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: S... David Greenman
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: S... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: dc driver and underruns (was: S... Mike Smith