> Using a non opensource commercial version control system is just > to ask for bad carma, extended murphy fields and whatnot in an > opensource volounteer project... I would like to understand the discussed weakness of cvs regarding branches. Could someone explain it (in private) or point me to a link? I ask because I had to work a lot with MKS SI (RCS based) and it was OK to manage different branches with it. So I assumed cvs as a kind of successor to rcs is able to do this too. Or do people just like an improved architecture? I understand that systems like Perforce are handling diffs to the code base not file orientated but rather goal orientated which might give a much better overview. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Soren Schmidt
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Dan Papasian
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Mark Murray
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Chuck Robey
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Adam
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Marc van Woerkom
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Dave Glowacki
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP ... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to ... Brian Somers
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Nick Hibma
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Mike Meyer
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Nik Clayton
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... John Baldwin