Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything. Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to change. :) - Jordan > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > :- "CVS branches suck" is the reason I belive. > > Bitkeeper? > > -- > Robert Withrow -- (+1 978 288 8256) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP deve... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP deve... Greg Lehey
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Jacques A . Vidrine
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Matthew Dillon
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Brian Somers
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP deve... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP ... Nick Hibma
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP ... Robert Withrow
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to ... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Soren Schmidt
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Dan Papasian
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Mark Murray
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Chuck Robey
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Adam
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization du... Marc van Woerkom