> Only if predictable have the same bits number as random. If not all bits of > random XOR-ed (i.e. half of random), it becomes weaker. Sigh. Exactly. The other half is _not_random_; I am not talking about it. > BTW, if they have the same bits number, > there is no reason to XOR random with predictable, random is not become > more random. If you doubt your randomness, XORing two quantities can improve it, if there is coincidence of random/non-random bits. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: mktemp() patch Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Matthew Dillon
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Warner Losh
- Re: mktemp() patch Kris Kennaway
- Re: mktemp() patch Peter Jeremy
- Re: mktemp() patch Warner Losh
- Re: mktemp() patch Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven