On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 09:13:30AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: Well, I tend to agree that it is not weakens random, but I not see any improvement too. > That is a pretty fundamental theorem of Cryptography. My suggestion > _strengthens_ the random number. All you lose is one bit if it If it not weakers I can't see why it strenghthens. I.e. you can constantly strenghthens generator with passing it through XOR -1? If not, why any other value is better than -1? -- Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: mktemp() patch Matthew Dillon
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: mktemp() patch Mark Murray
- Re: mktemp() patch Warner Losh
- Re: mktemp() patch Kris Kennaway
- Re: mktemp() patch Peter Jeremy
- Re: mktemp() patch Warner Losh
- Re: mktemp() patch Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: mktemp() patch Samuel Tardieu
- Re: mktemp() patch Garance A Drosihn