In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally > created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to > the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be commi... David Greenman
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be c... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be commi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be c... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be c... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Matthew Dillon
- To MFC or not to MFC, that is the que... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the... Matthew Dillon
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the... Mike Nowlin
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Nate Williams
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed... Rodney W. Grimes