In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > There's another good reason to MFC the linux patch on wednesday... > that is, to do it at the same time the SMP cleanup is MFC'd, and that > is because both patch sets require the linux kernel module to be > recompiled and I'd rather not force people to do that twice. Matt, this is not a valid reason either. Unless there is *urgent* and *overriding* reasons, and that basically means that the security-officer says so, all changes must be shaken out in -current first. That's just the way it is Matt. Get used to it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be commi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be c... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fi... David Greenman
- Re: Linux emulation scriptin... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be c... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scriptin... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scri... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scri... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Linux emulation scriptin... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Linux emulation scri... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scri... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scri... Matthew Dillon
- To MFC or not to MFC, th... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC... Mike Muir