> > Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally > > created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to > > the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. > > I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. > > 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be co... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Matthew Dillon
- To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ques... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Muir
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the ... Mike Nowlin
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Nate Williams
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to b... Mike Muir
- Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed t... Rodney W. Grimes
- SMP changes and breaking kld object module com... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object mo... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld objec... Jeroen C. van Gelderen