On 6/1/2010 3:38 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > This is unsufficient. What could work is if clang provided some common > symbol into all .o files generated by it, e.g. __clang_compiled. And > then kernel considered tainted with corresponding banner printed when > weak reference to that symbol is resolved to non-zero. This does not > handle modules and does not cleanly handle usermode runtime (libc, > libthr, rtld etc). >
Would it be sufficient if send-pr were modified to test the kernel, all loaded modules, and shared objects in /lib, /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib, and to list all items that were _not_ marked with the default compiler & version? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
