On Mon, 31 May 2010 06:11:32 -0500 Astrodog <astro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I understand the build process correctly, it should be possible to > have both compilers in base for some (presumably short) period of > time... then just have which one you use be a configuration option, > which should give LLVM/clang some additional exposure, without the > obvious risks of a complete switch. It should be relatively simply to > have "clang as a compile time option in base" then "clang as default > with gcc as an option" then "clang only", as it proves itself out > building the tree. From previous messages I don't think sparc64 is currently supported by clang very well, if at all, so I think we'll still need gcc in the base system for some time. -- Bruce Cran _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
