On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> >> On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: >> [snip interesting history] >> >>> I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows >>> the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. >> >> Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this >> footnote in James' email. It sounds like a sensible and useful >> suggestion that would go some way to addressing Kostik's concerns about >> knowing whether a kernel bug report was related to a gcc or clang built >> kernel. > > +1
I doubt there's anyone that would disagree with this. The only thing that would be painful is if there were mixed compiles with applications and triage, but if that was the case the user should debug their own issue because they'd be mixing and matching toolchains :/... Thanks, -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
