In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes: : I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making : it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability : for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more : complex then it already is. The danger is that the option exists in : the first place. I'm not for removing -e. It is useful to root for debugging. If ps can get this info from procfs, procfs could effectively enforce this restriction. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: PATCH for testing Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon
- Re: PATCH for testing Pierre Beyssac
- Re: PATCH for testing David Greenman
- Re: PATCH for testing Andreas Klemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon
- Re: PATCH for testing Andreas Klemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon