On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 02:27:10PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > And, also, we need to get rid of the 'e' option to ps entirely. It's a > major security hole. Not more so than option 'u', or even 'a', if you ask me. It's common knowledge under Unix that you shouldn't put anything sensitive in the command line or the environment. When there's any risk, the best option is to remove 'ps' alltogether, IMHO. -- Pierre Beyssac [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSD : il y a moins bien, mais c'est coté en bourse Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: ps -e Greg Lehey
- Re: PATCH for testing Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: PATCH for testing Sheldon Hearn
- Re: PATCH for testing Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCH for testing David Malone
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Adam Wight
- Re: PATCH for testing Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon
- Re: PATCH for testing Pierre Beyssac
- Re: PATCH for testing David Greenman
- Re: PATCH for testing Andreas Klemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon
- Re: PATCH for testing Andreas Klemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm