:In my opinion, doing so majorly bloats the proc struct for no good reason and
:also introduces gratuitous incompatibilities for utilities that want to modify
:their argv[*] and expect the modifications to show up in ps(1).
:
:-DG
:
:David Greenman
Well, I think there is an issue in the proc struct bloat but I disagree
strongly about modifying argv - any worthwhile code uses setproctitle()
now simply because the argv space is highly dependant on the number of
arguments passed to the program, and thus non deterministic. Since we
have setproctitle(), we can depreciate the argv junk.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Alex Zepeda
- Re: PATCH for testing Warner Losh
- Re: PATCH for testing Peter Wemm
- Re: PATCH for testing Matthew Dillon
- Re: PATCH for testing Garance A Drosihn
- Re: PATCH for testing Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: PATCH for testing John Saunders
- Re: PATCH for testing Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: PATCH for testing Oliver Fromme
- Re: PATCH for testing Oliver Fromme
- Re: PATCH for testing Julian Elischer
- Re: PATCH for testing Oliver Fromme
