> On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 11:41:14AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > PnP is an infrastructure facility used by drivers to detect and > > configure hardware. The side-effect you were relying on was that the > > old code would indiscriminately configure any and all PnP hardware > > regardless of whether a driver had requested it to. > > Why is this not desirable? I've already asked you to do your own research, and I meant it. The simple answer is "if we don't have a [working] driver for it, we don't want it". -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Chuck Robey
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Hellmuth Michaelis
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Hellmuth Michaelis
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Wierd su problem still there Adam Strohl
- Re: Wierd su problem still there Benjamin Lewis
- Re: Wierd su problem still there Adam Strohl
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Alex Perel