In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes:
>> I think that is too obscure considering the exposure this will get.
>
>What "exposure"? It's a backend to a tuning interface for our ABI
>compatibility...
We will be judged on how well we run linux more than many other sane
factors in the future.
>>From the perspective of an integrated namespace, we've already made the
>wrong moves insofar as vm.* should be kern.vm.*, vfs.* should be
>kern.vfs.*, etc. Either the entire kernel namespace should have a
>presumed leading kern. (and the existing kern.* nodes need to move) or
>we should relocate stuff to reflect a more ubuquitous naming
>arrangement.
You know, all your argument here supports is that the "kern" toplevel
tree is a mistake :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
