Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables

[Mike Smith]

> > Given that "ABI" is a bit obscure, kern.compat is the only sensible 
> > choice.
> 
> One one hand you're right (it is a compatibility stub) but OTOH it is also
> a kernel module... ;-)
> 
> Perhaps modules like this will want to have their stuff in BOTH places,
> i.e. in kernel.compat and in kernel.modules, depending what the given
> sysctl does.

Tuning parameters should be organised by function, not by 
implementation.

(Otherwise, think for a moment about a parameter that's used in more 
than one place...)

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message