Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables

[Mike Smith]

> >     Yes, this is very true.  But I think we are fooling ourselves if we 
> >     believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future.
> >     Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-)
> 
> Yeah... Then, the next in line after "linux" are: ibcs2 and svr4 and
> whatever comes next. Can you live with them as main sysctl categories?

Adding anything at the top level would be a terrible mistake.

Given that "ABI" is a bit obscure, kern.compat is the only sensible 
choice.

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message