On 18/02/2013 18:53, DaWorm wrote: > > If this is what is really desired, is this a good construct? > > try ... except ... finally ... except ... end; > > I don't care for the meaning of "except" looking to be contextual, > but is it really? Reading that, to me it looks mostly predictable > how the logic would have to work. I guess the only question is > whether the finally code is executed if the try code has an > exception. If this isn't desired, could a "break" be used in the > first except to cause the finally to be skipped? >
Does "break" do it in traditional try..finally..end? This new construct shall be no different. That's actually why I opt for just try..finally...except..end; too - because an exception in the 'finally' section, if it was the outer, could have unpredictable consequences; with 'except' being outer, at least your program will have a chance to still run and exit (more or less) gracefully. Lukasz > Jeff. > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
