On 13.02.2013 18:07, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Lukasz Sokol ha scritto:
On 13/02/2013 13:14, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'd rephrase what I discussed with Sven Barth:
this construct (the packed try.(1).finally.(2).except.(3).end;) - a
packed/condensed version -
I would be in favor of try..except..finally, as opposed to
try..finally..except, because I believe it better to handle exceptions
before, and clean-up after. Exception handling doesn't consist only in
showing an error box, it may involve also providing a remedy to some
errors, and hopefully passing to finally a cleaner situation to handle.
I'm ready to change advise if proved wrong.
As the proposed construct is a "mere" syntactic sugar anyway I see no
problem in allowing both cases (after all you can do both ways with the
original constructs as well)...
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
