On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Lukasz Sokol <el.es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe he one and true answer for all of the above would be to have: > > try vs try > try except > try finally > except except > end; end; > finally > end; > except > end; > > so with except being optionally allowed either side of 'finally' ? > > I haven't actually tried this, but what would this do? try try except end; finally try except end; end; If this is what is really desired, is this a good construct? try ... except ... finally ... except ... end; I don't care for the meaning of "except" looking to be contextual, but is it really? Reading that, to me it looks mostly predictable how the logic would have to work. I guess the only question is whether the finally code is executed if the try code has an exception. If this isn't desired, could a "break" be used in the first except to cause the finally to be skipped? Jeff.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
