On Mon, January 10, 2011 13:46, alexv...@mail.ru wrote: > 10.01.2011 15:31, Marco van de Voort пи�о�: >> In our previous episode, alexv...@mail.ru said: >>> But I want packages to be binary portable between OS (on target >>> processor architecture) >> That's effectively not possible with all OSes providing such emulation >> ABI. >> >> Esperanto for OSes so to speak. >> > Does "inefficiently" meansperformance decreaseis this case? Is it > significant?
If you refer to the word "effectively" stated by Marco, it probably meant "in effect", not "efficiently" (although such a solution would not be efficient either as mentioned by Marco's response). As an example, your proposal would imply that no external calls whatsoever would be possible (including calls to external libraries due to them using different calling conventions, etc.). Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
