10.01.2011 13:50, michael.vancann...@wisa.be пишет:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, alexv...@mail.ru wrote:
10.01.2011 13:05, michael.vancann...@wisa.be пишет:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/1/10 alexv...@mail.ru <alexv...@mail.ru>:
But I want packages to be binary portable between OS (on target
processor
architecture)
I don't think that is feasible, unless you don't use any OS features.
Exactly.
Even just because FPC supports multiple CPUs; You can't use an i386
package on SPARC or ARM.
So you'll always have to recompile your package for all platforms
that you want to support.
But only for all processors, not for all existing combinations of
processor and OS.
You should re-read Florian's email, and *fully* understand the
consequences.
Your proposal requires that we emulate all OSes on all other OSes,
because
the basic package (rtl or whatever it will be called) always depends
on the OS. There is no way around this.
My solution, in short, is that packages should have OS independent
interface to RTL built into executable visible to packages as RTL built
as c package (with is a bridge to real RTL).
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
