In our previous episode, alexv...@mail.ru said: > >> But I want packages to be binary portable between OS (on target > >> processor architecture)
> > That's effectively not possible with all OSes providing such emulation > > ABI. > > > > Esperanto for OSes so to speak. > > > Does "inefficiently" meansperformance decreaseis this case? Is it > significant? (1) I don't know where I use the word "inefficiently". (2) to answer the question anyway, the efficiency depends on the difference between the target platforms. Wine (windows on FreeBSD/Linux) is gigantic and noticably slower, but Linux binaries on FreeBSD are next to native. (the whole emulation is 60k and can load Linux dynlinker, libraries etc) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
