Take a look at http://www.tomhull.com/ocston/docs/mozgpl.html
Hard to do dual licence, I think.
Marco van Dijk.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort)
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/06/2008 10:34
|
|
> > I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if
> > we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license
> > it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our
> > executable. Does this pose any issues for us?
>
> MPL is not (modified) LGPL compatible either, so you need a dual
> license.
Hmm. Where did you get that? Do you btw understand the nature of the
MPL<->(L)GPL incompability?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any attachment(s) sent with it are intended exclusively for
the addressee(s), and may not be used by, opened by, passed on to, or made
available for use to, any person other than the addressee(s). Stork rules
out any and all liabilities resulting from any electronic transmission.
<<inline: pic01869.gif>>
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
