On 10/30/05, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If Variants could store objects and interface instances, maybe. > > They can? Simply use custom variants. >
Don't know what custom variants are. I'd appreciate a link to the documentation. > > I solved the problem using a single-rooted wrapper hierarchy (java > > style). It's not elegant nor efficient, > > Which isn't java either ... > I don't know how other developers work, but for us at work, development speed is far more important (several orders of magnitude) than execution speed. If using Haskell or Lisp lets us meet or beat the ever-closing deadlines, we "advice" the client to get really fast computer with lots and lots of memory :) I won't get into a "which is better" debate. I have enough of those trying to convince Debian users to switch Fedora :) We use the tool that better suits our needs. The only thing that we won't use, no matter how good or profitable they can be, are Microsoft products. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
