Am 30.03.20 um 22:07 schrieb Christo Crause via fpc-devel:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:00 PM Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org
<mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>> wrote:
Am 29.03.20 um 22:46 schrieb Christo Crause via fpc-devel:
> It seems that a different instruction sequence should be used for
sign
> extension for the lx106 subarch.
Ok, I see. Let me first integrate everything done so far in trunk, then
we can continue with the details :)
I've noticed GCC uses the SLLI + SRAI instructions to perform sign
extension on ESP8266.
Since different CPUs can support different subsets of the Xtensa
instructions do you think a finalizecode type function can be used as a
post code generation step to map unsupported instructions to alternative
sequences?
In this case just cgcpu can be adapted to generate the right code. This
results normally in better code.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
