Sure..except we weren't asking contributors to use this feedback to fix up the articles. I do know that even without any standing system to improve it, several article improvements were made. All I can give you quantifiably, though, is that editors saw the feedback, and thought a big chunk of it was "stuff I can use".
On 9 February 2012 04:44, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other > > point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is > > done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured... > > you say that you have existing feedback, and contributors have seen > this feedback. > You *can* already determine whether that feedback (already in hand) > resulted in article improvements. > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Oliver Keyes Community Liaison, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
