On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this without full deployment, please, go ahead. On the second, it should scale; we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages)
On 9 February 2012 04:17, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > Minata: I imagine the plan is "deploy on enwiki, and if other wikis ask > for > > it, they can have it too", but I'll find out :). > > > > In reply to "It allows readers to provide feedback; that feedback is not > > likely to > > result in improvements except in rare cases" - actually, no. We ran > several > > rounds of hand-coding, and between 35-70 percent (rounding; it depends on > > which form you use, and which criteria) of feedback is deemed useful by > > editors. This could be praise for the article, suggestions for new > things, > > or notes of errors with existing content. > > And what percentage of the feedback resulted in article improvements? > > And will that scale when feedback is being left about all articles? > > Even useful notes left on the talk page are unlikely to result in > article improvements within a reasonable timeframe. > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Oliver Keyes Community Liaison, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
