We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
On 9 February 2012 04:34, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this > > without full deployment, please, go ahead. > > feedback was sent to contributors? > did the contributor make use of the feedback? > if not, why not? > > > On the second, it should scale; > > we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages) > > I'm not talking about server scalability. im suggesting that you dont > know whether the community can use the feedback effectively without > answering the first question. > > "Improve this page" is unfounded until there is evidence that the > feedback *will* be used by the community. > > p.s. it should be "Improve this article" > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Oliver Keyes Community Liaison, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
