On 21 September 2011 21:20, Kanzlei <kanz...@f-t-hofmann.de> wrote: > This poll was not representative for wikipedia readers, but only for some > German wikipedia editors. Scientifically research found that Germa editors > are not representative for German speaking people but far more > environmetal-liberal-leftists than avarage Germans. The poll was even not > representative for German editors because only a few voted.
233 would be a *large* turnout on en:wp. What is a large turnout on de:wp? Your arguments look to me like fully-general counterarguments against *any* on-Wikipedia poll whatsoever, no matter the structure or subject. What would you accept as a measure of the de:wp community that would actually be feasible to conduct? - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
