On 21 September 2011 11:10, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 21.09.2011 19:36, schrieb Kanzlei: >> Am 21.09.2011 um 19:04 schrieb Tobias >> Oelgarte<tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com>: >> >>> Don't you think that we would have thousands of complaints a day if your >>> words would be true at all? Just have a look at the article [[hentai]] >>> and look at the illustration. How many complaints about this image do we >>> get a day? None, because it is less then one complain in a month, while >>> the article itself is viewed about 8.000 times a day.[1] That would make >>> up one complainer in 240.000 (0,0004%). Now we could argue that only >>> some of them would comment on the issue. Lets assume 1 of 100 or even 1 >>> of 1000. Then it are still only 0,04% or 0,4%. That is the big mass of >>> users we want to support get more contributers? >>> >>> [1] http://stats.grok.se/en/201109/hentai >> Your assumtion is wrong. The 8.000 daily are neither neutral nor >> representative for all users. Put the picture on the main page and You get >> representative results. We had that in Germany. > Yes we put the "vulva" on the main page and it got quite some attention. > We wanted it this way to test out the reaction of the readers and to > start a discussion about it. The result was as expected. Complains that > it is offensive together with Praises to show what neutrality really is. > After the discussion settled, we opened a Meinungsbild (Poll) to > question if any article/image would be suitable for the main page > (Actually it asked to not allow any topic). The result was very clear. > 13 supported the approach to leave out some content from the main page. > 233 (95%) were against the approach to hide some subjects from the main > page.
Can you point me towards that poll? Thanks, Sue _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
