Am 21.09.2011 22:37, schrieb David Gerard: > On 21 September 2011 21:20, Kanzlei<kanz...@f-t-hofmann.de> wrote: > >> This poll was not representative for wikipedia readers, but only for some >> German wikipedia editors. Scientifically research found that Germa editors >> are not representative for German speaking people but far more >> environmetal-liberal-leftists than avarage Germans. The poll was even not >> representative for German editors because only a few voted. > > 233 would be a *large* turnout on en:wp. What is a large turnout on de:wp? > > Your arguments look to me like fully-general counterarguments against > *any* on-Wikipedia poll whatsoever, no matter the structure or > subject. What would you accept as a measure of the de:wp community > that would actually be feasible to conduct? > > > - d. > A so called "Meinungsbild" (opinion poll) is the tool of choice to make basic decisions for the project. Admins and authors are bound to such decisions. It usually needs 2/3 of the users to agree with a proposal (formally correctness) and 2/3 of the users actually voting for and not against the proposal. There may be variations depending on the questioning.
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
