I am going to be quite frank and say that it is pointless to have this discussion on this list. Only a fraction of the english wikipedia community are on it. If you are genuinely serious about this then propose it on the english wikipedia. This is not a foundation level issue nor will it ever become one so put it to the community.
Seddon On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Amir E. Aharoni < amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: > 2011/1/16 Yaroslav M. Blanter <pute...@mccme.ru>: > > > >> Nope, it doesn't have to be this way. There should be no "full admins" > >> and "partial admins"; there should be no "admins" at all. There should > >> be people who protect pages and people who block vandals. Some people > >> may have both permissions. > >> > > > > The suggestion sounds reasonable to me, but I do not see any way it could > > be implemented. > > You think that the community will object? I understand where that > feeling comes from, but if the community really wants to have > "administrators" that have both privileges, it may continue with the > current deal by granting both of them to whoever passes "RFA". > > In fact it's quite likely that communities will want to give as little > permissions as possible to users. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
