On 16 January 2011 07:45, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: > What they do in the Portuguese Wikipedia is not what i propose; it's > only close to it. What's listed at [[en:Wikipedia:Perennial > proposals]] is very different from what i propose. I don't propose > limited adminship; i propose to retire the concept of adminship > entirely, because it's an outdated lump of very different things. (And > by the way, i have a habit of re-reading Perennial proposals every > couple of months.)
You would have some people that have all the different things and some that only have a few. The former would, in essence, be admins and the latter limited admins. > A checkuser, for example, is not a limited admin. He's a checkuser and > it's good that it is this way. Are there any checkusers that aren't admins already? Checkuser is an extra tool given to admins, not a tool given out independantly of other tools. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
