On 01/18/2011 09:57 PM, Sage Ross wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Amir E. Aharoni > <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: >> >> That's the point - i do think that it's a Foundation-level issue, or >> more precisely, movement-level issue. That's because "RFA is broken" >> discussion are perennial in all Wikipedias which have functioning >> communities of about 50 regular writers or more. >> > > [citation needed] > > And I don't mean that all facetiously. It'd be worth documenting the > relative "brokenness" of admin selection processes across languages. > We have some interesting analyses of adminship on English Wikipedia > that brought a few of the problems into sharper focus, but nothing > that I know of in a similar vein that looks across multiple languages. > > Are all the "RFA is broken" discussions talking about similar things? > Or is each broken in its own special way?
why should tht be decided on foundation level? Do you think communities are so broken that they cannot make their own decisions? This would be the only reason to start discussing enforcement of such major changes. masti _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
