On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 17:25, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote many things.
My sidenote is that if you believe in what you say then you imply Wikipedia, Wikimedia and everything we have with 'wiki' string in it, and every method we use which described as 'wiki-way of web publishing' violates Ward's intellectual rights since it was him who first used the word, who conjured up the method and made it known. He didn't, doesn't, and won't, and never intended to interfere, however please realise that "wiki" was _well_before_ Wikipedia, both the term and the method, and we just use them out of the kindness of Ward ["courtesy of Ward" - if it were a commercial thing :)]. Trying to claim rights on someone else's work is at best uncivilised. (But of course the legal way is that if you'd try to trademark it it would be nullified by prior art in five seconds.) I would like this thread to stop as it's now really just a waste of precious bits of ones and zeroes. I guess the original question was overanswered now. Let's move on to real problems. World peace, anyone? Thanks, [[user:grin|<g>]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
