On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "Dog" isn't strongly associated in the public psyche with a particular > brand. "Wiki" is. Like I say, these are complicated issues of legal > interpretation and really should be left to the lawyers. > What's relevant is that the WMF doesn't regard "wiki" as a protected mark. There are zillions of wikis out there, and whether they are actually massively editable (and in my experience, most of them actually are not) is irrelevant to the question of trademarks and the WMF. You don't need to be a lawyer to figure that out. Nathan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
