On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are > plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support > a view that there is any reasonable justification (by moral > or juridifical standards) to claim WMF is the body to apply > for permission to use "wiki" on something. That just ain't > gonna happen, *nohow*. Sorry. That is just a fact. Don't try > to squirm. Frankly, if we *could* try to claim a trademark on the word "wiki", we *shouldn't*. At most, ask the site nicely to note somewhere they're nothing to do with "Wikipedia." - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
